Assassination Attempt In Tucson

Earlier today* US Congress Representative Gabrielle Gifford was shot at point-blank range by an assailant who then sprayed bullets into the surrounding public and staffing aides. News tonight seems to be that Gifford might make it out ok, apparently she came out of surgery successfully and is able to communicate on some level with her family.

Others were not so lucky. Six people were killed in the incident, including District Judge John Roll and a child. Unfortunately not much information has been released about the others.

Many have been quick to suggest that we should not consider this shooting politically motivated. I would love to live with that kind of naivety. An assassination attempt on a politician is political. You cannot divorce the two concepts. James Fallows of the Atlantic has a good summation of this.

Fallows further explains that we may never really understand the political motives because as we like to say, the personal is political. Jared Loughner’s own personal politics are probably not likely to resonate with very many people.

Which brings us to the other side. The people that insist they know why Loughner did this. Predictably the hard right tries to declare he’s a communist because he apparently listed that he liked “The Communist Manifesto”. Of course he also listed that he liked the writings of right-wing darling Ayn Rand and right-wing dictator Adolph Hitler. Liberals say he seems to be really into the gold standard and he must be a tea-partier.

The only thing you could possibly say for sure is that this individual was extremely anti-government, which is a feature of extreme ideologies on both ends.

It will take a while for the dust to settle on this, but I will say this: Sarah Palin needs to apologize.

Ok, that feels out of nowhere considering I just finished explaining that we have no idea where Loughner true affiliations lie, but I will explain. Palin created a list of 20 people of congress that needed to be removed due to their support of the health care bill. With this list she created a map of targets, made with gun cross hairs. The graphic can still be seen here.

She and/or her handlers decided it would be prudent to make this graphic disappear off of her website. It seems even Palin can realize that it’s awfully gauche to suggest target practice on a woman nearly killed by gunfire. That is why she needs to apologize; if it’s bad enough to remove from your website, it’s bad enough to be an adult and admit you made a mistake.

And with that I end, with my thoughts in a jumble.

*So technically I’m early into the next day, whatever.

Actually, Words Do Have Meaning

Self-Portrait

Some guy hit my fender, and I told him, ‘Be fruitful and multiply,’ but not in those words.

Woody Allen

Slate (Double X) did a big piece asking their contributors (and some others) to define “Who gets to be a feminist?” Let the equivocating begin!

What the conversation actually centred around was whether or not Sarah Palin can call herself feminist. Which of course she “can” but that doesn’t mean she has freaking clue as to what it actually is. Sarah Palin is about as feminist as I am dragonfruit.

Many suggested that there are no criteria for what a feminist is or that, if there were, being pro-choice was not one of them.  And North Korea is really democratic because it says so right in the name, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Um, no. Just like Kim Jong-Il cannot call himself a democratic leader because he does not believe in the tenants of democracy, Palin cannot call herself a feminist when she does not believe in the tenants of feminism.  Sadly, the whole telling other women what to do with their uteruses* is the least of Palin’s problems in this regard.

Palin’s sole contribution women has been coining the term “mama grizzly.” The women she chooses to support in the political arena are just other women who don’t really care about women.# Instead these are women who are anti-sex, women who are anti-environment, women who are anti-minimum wage, women who are anti-welfare, women who are anti-gay, women who are anti-science, women who are anti-immigrant. These are the platforms they run on, there is nothing pro-equality about them. These are women who are anti-feminist.

So let’s cut the bullshit. Feminism is a club and if you don’t pay your dues you don’t get to be a member. There is a lot of variety, but you have to actually care about women’s equality, and that means respecting whatever they decide to do with their uteri.*

If Palin actually starts caring about women, we might review her application. Until then… be fruitful and multiply.

*Apparently both are correct.
#Seriously, wikipedia has listed 23 female candidates that Palin has endorsed. One! Just one, bothered to do anything caring about women’s health, economic opportunities, or safety. This groups does more to advance the rights of rifles than women.

Subscribe

  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter