<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schizmu &#187; feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schizmu.net/tag/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schizmu.net</link>
	<description>Canadian, Political, Egalitarian, and Snarky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Actually, Words Do Have Meaning</title>
		<link>http://www.schizmu.net/2010/10/actually-words-do-have-meaning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.schizmu.net/2010/10/actually-words-do-have-meaning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypatia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schizmu.net/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some guy hit my fender, and I told him, &#8216;Be fruitful and multiply,&#8217; but not in those words. Woody Allen Slate (Double X) did a big piece asking their contributors (and some others) to define &#8220;Who gets to be a feminist?&#8221; Let the equivocating begin! What the conversation actually centred around was whether or not &#8230; <a href="http://www.schizmu.net/2010/10/actually-words-do-have-meaning/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_72" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/winnipeglovesmyrone/4344487182/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-72" title="Dragonfruit" src="http://www.schizmu.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/4344487182_7c5e915fc0-300x155.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="155" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Self-Portrait</p></div>
<blockquote><p>Some guy hit my fender, and I told him, &#8216;Be fruitful and multiply,&#8217; but not in those words.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/woodyallen138148.html">Woody Allen</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a title="Who Gets To Be a Feminist?" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2270053/entry/2270054/">Slate (Double X)</a> did a big piece asking their contributors (and some others) to define &#8220;Who gets to be a feminist?&#8221; Let the equivocating begin!</p>
<p>What the conversation actually centred around was whether or not Sarah Palin can call herself feminist. Which of course she &#8220;can&#8221; but that doesn&#8217;t mean she has freaking clue as to what it actually is. Sarah Palin is about as feminist as I am dragonfruit.</p>
<p>Many suggested that there are no criteria for what a feminist is or that, if there were, being pro-choice was not one of them.  And North Korea is really democratic because it says so right in the name, Democratic People&#8217;s Republic of Korea.</p>
<p>Um, no. Just like Kim Jong-Il cannot call himself a democratic leader because he does not believe in the tenants of democracy, Palin cannot call herself a feminist when she does not believe in the tenants of feminism.  Sadly, the whole telling other women what to do with their uteruses* is the least of Palin&#8217;s problems in this regard.</p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s sole contribution women has been coining the term &#8220;mama grizzly.&#8221; The women she chooses to support in the political arena are just other women who don&#8217;t really care about women.# Instead these are women who are anti-sex, women who are anti-environment, women who are anti-minimum wage, women who are anti-welfare, women who are anti-gay, women who are anti-science, women who are anti-immigrant. These are the platforms they run on, there is nothing pro-equality about them. These are women who are anti-feminist.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s cut the bullshit. Feminism is a club and if you don&#8217;t pay your dues you don&#8217;t get to be a member. There is a lot of variety, but you have to actually care about women&#8217;s equality, and that means respecting whatever they decide to do with their uteri.*</p>
<p>If Palin actually starts caring about women, we might review her application. Until then&#8230; be fruitful and multiply.</p>
<h6><span style="color: #999999;"><span style="color: #999999;">*Apparently both are correct.<br />
</span> </span><strong><span style="color: #999999;">#Seriously, wikipedia has listed 23 female candidates that Palin has endorsed. One! Just one, bothered to do anything caring about women&#8217;s health, economic opportunities, or safety. This groups does more to advance the rights of rifles than women.</span></strong></h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schizmu.net/2010/10/actually-words-do-have-meaning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

