Why “Personal Responsibility” Doesn’t Cut It

Whenever adults try to a rational conversation about health, food politics, and the “obesity crisis,” the pack of disingenuous whiners isn’t far behind.

Subsidies and the rise of cheap, bad food; “Personal responsibility!” they cry.

Trans fats, salt, and high levels of sugar; “Personal responsibility!”

Food deserts, long commutes, erosion of family time, lack of sleep and about a billion other things that have been linked to rising unhealthiness in our population? “Personal responsibility!”

Of course, that is complete and utter bull but, uh… (Put in your own phrase about how people are idiots, but you know, with a nicer tone.)

I came across two very good example however on why the average person is just simply not equipped to navigate the food minefield that is out there.

The first comes from a series carried on the Toronto Star website call The Dish. The concept is simple; readers ask about the nutritional information on some of their favourite restaurant and take-out foods and the details of the calorie, fat and salt content are published in the column.

This week they tested a spelt scone from a local bakery. The scone was advertised to contain 220 calories. What it actually possessed was 620 calories, about 180% more calories than was actually advertised. How is someone supposed to defend against that?

Wait, I can already hear it. You shouldn’t eat out, you should bring your food from home, you’re obviously just lazy, blah, blah, blah. Pour on the ridiculous and unattainable standards. Almost everyone is going to come to the point where they forgot, they ran out of time, they’re on the road, or other shit just got in the way. Some of us live ridiculously busy lives, or with complications that you would care not to think about. Some of us just want to take the time to relax and enjoy ourselves. Guess what? Everyone deserves the right to know what they’re eating and to certainly not be mislead about how much they are consuming.

Which brings me to point two. This week Campbell’s, of Campbell Soup Company fame announced that they would be added more salt to their soups to increase flagging sales.

This is of course, after a long hard campaign of telling people how good they are for reducing the sodium in their products. Who wants to bet we aren’t going to the see the ads describing how they have cranked the salt content?

How are consumers supposed to make good and healthy choices when the companies keep changing the goalposts? Now, not only do I have to check the label the first time I buy something, I have to check the label every time I purchase that product because who knows what the nutritional information is going to be this week. I’m betting there will be a point where both the higher sodium and lower sodium versions will be on the same shelf at the same time and the poor consumer will have to check every can that makes it into their cart.

The average person just doesn’t have time for that kind of crap. I already make my poor partner cry with my obsessive label checking; it certainly is going to happen with a mom who just wants to get in and out of the grocery store with her sanity intact while towing two tots along.

Voicing these concerns will have you admonished for ever daring to buy a product that comes in a package. Any one who dares to not bake their own bread from scratch, press their own tofu or culture their own yogurt from the fresh milk provided by their own holstein in their own backyard, obviously does not care about their or their family’s health.

No, the public does not need to be bashed over the head with the fact that potato chips are not a health food, but consumers still deserve some support in being able to quickly identify what is actually healthy on store shelves.

The Kids Are Alright

Sorry, I know I stated I would follow up the last post with one on efforts that actually prevent sexual assault but the inability of the Toronto Star to just let this story die has completely distracted me.

On Sunday they did a piece on a child who is being raised “genderless.” Which, honestly, where to start. How about with the title “Parents keep child’s gender secret” or as I like to call it “How to fail Sex and Sexuality 101.” Every toddler’s gender is a secret. Gender is a psychological component of one’s sexuality. It’s something that we develop by ourselves. It is also a social construct, we often have certain behavioural expectations based on an individual’s presented gender. What the parent’s are actually doing is not informing everyone what little Storm’s genitals look like aka one’s “sex.”

I gave the story a quick look over and avoided the comments like the plague, but the damn thing keeps coming up. Article after article. Earlier they even had a poll where you could vote on the sex of the child on the front page. Oh joy! Because if you don’t know whether the child has a penis or a vagina you can just put it up to be decided by public opinion.

I feel a migraine coming on.

So I get drawn in. Of course, we cannot have a discussion on parenting without some serious judgment. Some even went so far as to claim that the parents were abusing the child. Why? Because they are not covering the child in pink and Barbies or in blue and Hot Wheels? Funny definitions they have of abuse these days.

What’s interesting to me is that those most adamant on gender roles are also more likely to believe that gender and sex are inseparable. Those with penises will always be boys who will prefer transformers over ponies etc. An immutable trait that parenting isn’t going to have any affect on. So why are they so worried?

Well, several reasons. For one side it is because they fear that gender isn’t as “set” as they would like it to be and  that with a little gender bending you will create a bunch of so-called scary individuals who see themselves as transgendered or transsexual. Mostly the religious, closed-minded set; they deny the reality about the fluidity of gender and sexuality.

The other section seems completely terrified that the child is not going to figure out what genitals they have unless somebody tells them. Bring in the cracks about what bathroom Storm will use.  Or that the child will freak out once puberty strikes. They try to equate letting a child decide a gender with parents forcing a gender identity opposite of their sex organs. Again this still seems to come down to the fear that children will not fall in line with the proper gender and sex identity combination. Which honestly is just plain odd, the family is not trying to raise their children as the opposite genders of their sex and most people will find their gender aligns with their biological sex. So just calm the heck down people.

It is important to note that no one is denying Storm a gender. This passage is the most important to me. “The couple plan to keep Storm’s sex a secret as long as Storm, Kio and Jazz are comfortable with it.” Again, no one is hiding the sex of children from the children themselves. Storm will know one’s sex and will be free to choose how and when to let the world at large know what their gender expectations are. As a four month old who can’t even comprehend the shape of their genitals right now, just let them be a baby.

Doctors Getting Paid to Cure “The Gay”

I don’t know what is the more disturbing aspect of this story coming out of Alberta.

The fact that in 2010 the province still had “homosexuality” listed as a mental disorder on the same level of pedophilia? Cue some equivocating about how being gay may contribute to someone’s depression due to peer teasing. Right along with a myriad of reasons kids will pick on other kids. If a child suffers from depression due to faceing racial or disability discrimination, should we slap them with mental disorders as well? We could call them “Not-White Disorder” and perhaps “Mobility Device Affliction.”*

The Alberta Health Ministry has now finally dropped being gay as a disorder, thirty-seven years after the American Psychiatric Association, twenty-eight years after the Canadian Psychiatric Association and five years after China. China for crying out loud. They had promised to repeal the designation at an earlier date, twelve years ago. Yeah I know, human dignity is not big on the priority list

Next disturbing aspect, that there were actually doctors who billed the province for treating homosexuality as a disorder. Why are they allowed to do this? And that’s not even regarding the legal aspects of the province. How in the world do they stay licensed while being that unethical

How about the fact that these doctors are still going to be paid by the province? Really? I’m sorry but at this point you just need to tell these psychiatrists, “Tough luck, you no longer get to profit from a non-existent disorder.”

201o! Twenty-fricken-ten!

*Which I’m sure will be listed as disorders as soon as they find a pill for them.

Subscribe

  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter